Plagiarism All a familiar word. But all is probable not collided(faced) personally. Endurances(Quotations) from the Sevastopol forum: Well, that sirs I tell to you быль. Unpleasant. Rather. Therefore always you hope that yours достопочтимые colleagues (i.e. photographers) are noble, talented and fair. I am engaged in a photo for a long time. 7 years. And not time collided(faced) that works are used not always AS it would be desirable. The customer could place a photo in advertising and up to the statement of the project in absolutely not in that place about which it was stipulated, and work on an another's exhibition got. But what I would wash work have signed the ANOTHER'S surname and have started up all this put in the fair brochure as advertising of photoservices and визажа?!!! This rudeness. Impudent rudeness. And I have seen this prospectus next day after an output(exit) in a seal. By this rudeness were distinguished studio визажа FIRST LINE Alekseevoj Svetlanas and photographer V.Voronin........ To me it is insulting. How it is possible to begin business with plagiarism? How it is possible for the photographer обмараться on such? Elena, fasten! It in your life will be possible yet time.... It is possible to do some fighting certainly in court.... Yes the game is not worth the candle.... But the positive party(side) of a medal - your photos, means really СУПЕР! And a penny the price to photographer Voroninu.... П, With, - lay out the facts плиз.... It would be desirable to look at your work under another's assignment... And why for the beginning to not try in studio to call and agree amicably. It is quite possible, that they just and have no concept, that your photo. That at once court... Court... Peacefully many questions where are solved better and fastly. Good luck! Ask not less than 500 $ or are threatened by court In this case the original file serves for an establishment of authorship of the image. In the booklet lady обтравлена, and on the original she(it) is removed(taken off) in studios, therefore authorship лекго will prove. On the future: if you want to prove the correctness in court necessarily leave the initial images which have been not missed through graphic editors. And, to give or publish somewhere the staff it is necessary not completely (enough кропнуть a little) that then at presentation of the original, it was visible, whence it is taken the staff. PS. The image of the booklet is not enough, therefore I anywhere have not seen an inscription that is photo Воронина. There is a phrase, that in studio the photographer works and near to a phrase there is a stylization under the signature with a surname of the photographer. But whether there is there an instruction(indication), what for manufacturing the booklet is used by photo Воронина? I had in view of, that the surname of the photographer written in English in stylistics of the signature, near to a photo does not mean, that it(he) its(her) author (can, it is the signature of the model) as there is no direct instruction(indication) on authorship. Therefore at once to do(make) arrivals on the colleague not absolutely ethically. That касаемо demonstration performance in court to submit it is necessary. And to submit on studio визажа. Therefore as « Copyrights are not хер dog » © самизнаетекто. Lena ask in a photoclub how to operate, there such прецендентов much already was. Even once have shaken out money from one deputy. Lena - the excellent(different) photographer and the class person. I precisely know it!